Google, Twitter, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple - they're all nudging their users inside their own ecosystems and making it harder to stay outside. Why? For money
Digital life has an increasingly Orwellian future: the big ecosystem creators are slowly but inexorably nudging users towards their ecosystems. It's like the Iron Curtain coming down across Europe after the second world war.
It is very subtle, it is very slow, but the signs are there that the long term of ambition of Google, Twitter, FaceBook, Microsoft, Apple and so on is to keep their users to themselves and lock out everyone else.
Under the guise of a cleanup, Google has been killing support for protocols and applications that allow users of other ecosystems to get access to Google services.
Twitter is just the same, having closed down its third-party API meaning that those wanting access to Twitter have to visit the website or use its dedicated app; new third-party apps are strictly limited.
Google Reader, Exchange ActiveSync, and the Google Voice app for BlackBerry are all gone and now Google has pulled the plug on its site blocking service for searchers.
Some of these are simply not used enough to make it economic to continue support, but others simply make life more difficult for those on another ecosystem to get access to Google services.
If a user is on a device or an application created by an ecosystem then the ecosystem will reap the benefits of that usage.
*Follow the money*
Google derives a large percentage of its mobile advertising revenues from searches, maps and Gmail activity carried out on Apple's iOS devices.
But quite how Google benefits from Windows Phone users getting access to their PIM (Personal Information Management) data via a third party API is less obvious, and I suspect is a major reason why I see the ecosystems quietly putting this sort of access to sleep.
This is likely to be replaced, but with something where there is a clear benefit to the provider of the service.
In the case of ActiveSync, I would expect these to be replaced with either Gmail and Calendar applications for Windows Phone, or a method of synchronisation over which Google has more control.
*New walled gardens*
As the walls around the different ecosystem go up - or, alternatively, as the iron curtains come down - I can see users being pushed into making a choice regarding in which ecosystem they will live their digital lives. Which side of the wall are you on? You have to choose.
The more a user spends in a company's ecosystem and applications, the more the company learns about them and the more valuable that user becomes when it comes to selling targeted advertising.
The ecosystems are not going to be free. Users either pay with hard cash or personal data - of which I suspect personal data is going to be the overwhelming favourite.
Expect this trend to continue.
Richard Windsor is a former technology analyst at Nomura Securities. He now blogs at Radio Free Mobile, where this post first appeared. Reported by guardian.co.uk 5 hours ago.
Digital life has an increasingly Orwellian future: the big ecosystem creators are slowly but inexorably nudging users towards their ecosystems. It's like the Iron Curtain coming down across Europe after the second world war.
It is very subtle, it is very slow, but the signs are there that the long term of ambition of Google, Twitter, FaceBook, Microsoft, Apple and so on is to keep their users to themselves and lock out everyone else.
Under the guise of a cleanup, Google has been killing support for protocols and applications that allow users of other ecosystems to get access to Google services.
Twitter is just the same, having closed down its third-party API meaning that those wanting access to Twitter have to visit the website or use its dedicated app; new third-party apps are strictly limited.
Google Reader, Exchange ActiveSync, and the Google Voice app for BlackBerry are all gone and now Google has pulled the plug on its site blocking service for searchers.
Some of these are simply not used enough to make it economic to continue support, but others simply make life more difficult for those on another ecosystem to get access to Google services.
If a user is on a device or an application created by an ecosystem then the ecosystem will reap the benefits of that usage.
*Follow the money*
Google derives a large percentage of its mobile advertising revenues from searches, maps and Gmail activity carried out on Apple's iOS devices.
But quite how Google benefits from Windows Phone users getting access to their PIM (Personal Information Management) data via a third party API is less obvious, and I suspect is a major reason why I see the ecosystems quietly putting this sort of access to sleep.
This is likely to be replaced, but with something where there is a clear benefit to the provider of the service.
In the case of ActiveSync, I would expect these to be replaced with either Gmail and Calendar applications for Windows Phone, or a method of synchronisation over which Google has more control.
*New walled gardens*
As the walls around the different ecosystem go up - or, alternatively, as the iron curtains come down - I can see users being pushed into making a choice regarding in which ecosystem they will live their digital lives. Which side of the wall are you on? You have to choose.
The more a user spends in a company's ecosystem and applications, the more the company learns about them and the more valuable that user becomes when it comes to selling targeted advertising.
The ecosystems are not going to be free. Users either pay with hard cash or personal data - of which I suspect personal data is going to be the overwhelming favourite.
Expect this trend to continue.
Richard Windsor is a former technology analyst at Nomura Securities. He now blogs at Radio Free Mobile, where this post first appeared. Reported by guardian.co.uk 5 hours ago.